If you suspect a colleague may have an addiction that threatens public welfare and you leave a brochure for help, are you required to take further action?

In situations where public welfare may be at risk due to a colleague's suspected addiction, the ethical obligation often compels one to take further action beyond simply leaving a resource like a brochure. While leaving a pamphlet is a good first step in providing information and support, it does not sufficiently address the potential dangers posed to the public.

Professional guidelines and ethical codes often uphold that when awareness of impairment or addiction arises, it is critical to take steps to protect the health and safety of others. This means that if one suspects a colleague's condition could result in harm to patients or the public, they typically have a duty to report their concerns to the appropriate authorities within their organization or to license regulatory boards. This responsibility exists to ensure that individuals who might be in need of support receive it, and to uphold the integrity of the profession and protect the welfare of those the profession serves.

Leaving the brochure alone does not fulfill the obligation to act in the interest of public safety and the ethical standards of the profession, making it imperative to take further action.